The truth doesn’t fit the narrative

This is an excerpt of an older article by Ann Coulter about the Trayvon Martin case, which I discovered by following Joe Huffman’s excellent blog. Copied and pasted from Joe, whom you should be reading.

… Republicans eventually had to fight a Civil War to get the Democrats to give up slavery.

Alas, they were Democrats, so they cheated.

After the war, Democratic legislatures enacted “Black Codes,” denying black Americans the right of citizenship — such as the rather crucial one of bearing arms — while other Democrats (sometimes the same Democrats) founded the Ku Klux Klan.

For more than a hundred years, Republicans have aggressively supported arming blacks, so they could defend themselves against Democrats.

Ann Coulter, 23 April 2012

Philosophy… from a video game?

Disclaimer: Somebody, somewhere is going to accuse this post of being juvenile or childish because it was a line of dialogue from a game that inspired me. Someone else will think it’s racist. Honestly, it’s just me working out my thoughts on the topic, free-form as I go. I said I needed to think this through and go through several drafts before publishing, but using the typing of this post seems to be helping my thought process.

All scientific advancement due to intelligence overcoming, compensating for limitation. Can’t carry a load, so invent wheel. Can’t catch food, so invent spear. Limitations. No limitations, no advancement. No advancement, culture stagnates. Works other way, too. Advancement before culture is ready. Disastrous.
-Mordin Solus
Mass Effect 2

Sometimes you already have a thought or idea in mind. Maybe you don’t quite know how to adequately express it, but it’s like this fundamental truth that you understand. Then, somebody or something re-words it just slightly or puts into context, a whole new light gets shone on it, and you have this revelation of why you knew this thing to be true. That’s what this conversation in a video game did for me.

This really got me thinking, maybe because I’m deployed on the east coast of Africa and trying to wrap my head around why they do things the way they do here. The culture is so different, and it’s manifest in such strange ways. It’s little details like a luxury home not having any kind of gasket on the (massive) doors or frames, so every time they close they sound like a giant drum as the huge plank of wood that is the door vibrates as one tremendous membrane. Or that they use trash cans, but no trash bags or liners, so the bins get disgusting and caked with dried layers of liquid waste. The bathroom in a building smelling worse that outhouses I’ve used, as if to prove that construction is no guarantee of better sanitation than a hole in the ground.

I watched an interview on BBC in March 2003 of a man on the streets of Baghdad talking about why they’ll conquer the infidel in battle. To prove his might or manliness he whipped out his AK47 and just started firing on full auto up into the air, with no concept or thought as to where those rounds might eventually land.

Mark Bowden quoted somebody (and I paraphrase, for recollection’s sake) on the DVD special features of Black Hawk Down as saying, “Everything possible that can be accomplished with guns has been accomplished in Mogadishu.” Except that’s typical, liberal bull**** and untrue. That’s somebody who doesn’t like guns and projecting his opinion on the situation as if the firearm itself has a causative nature. It completely ignores the provision of food, justified self-defense or defense of family by an otherwise peaceful person, or even just friendly and polite competition. It’s a problem of culture, and I think it’s way past time that we started admitting it.

I use firearms, and construction, and cleanliness, and driving as my examples for this cultural divide because it’s what I’m exposed to and what I can see. I see the everyday norm and typical culture as I shop in grocery stores and try to find Listerine over here. And in my everyday observations, from the bizarre routes people walk in the streets to the way they’ll literally just type anything into the grocery store register with no accounting for stock, my pervading thought is, “What in the hell are these people doing/thinking?”

Now, if this were really a racist diatribe, it would be easy to write them all off as morons or any number of more detestable insults (which I find offensive and won’t repeat). But that kind of thinking is short-sighted and stupid on it’s own. Unless there’s an environmental effect causing mass brain damage to an entire population, it’s ridiculous to think “they’re all stupid”. Brain power and intelligence have nothing to do with it, because any individual can be taught or educated. What it comes down to (and this crosses ALL national and racial lines) is culture. I don’t care if you’re American or Chinese, white or a beautiful shade of brown: Your capacity for excellence stems from your individual drive, and that’s largely contributed to by the culture you’re raised in.

I’m getting dangerously close to slipping to the “Thoughts on Excellence” essay I plan to write.

So let’s get back to the cultural thing. I think it should be universally agreed that slavery is an awful thing and one of the worst crimes man can commit upon his fellow man. But slavery has been abolished in the US for a long time (even longer in the UK) and the civil rights movement has basically equalized the races in the States (despite what race-baiters like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton say, because they ignore the cultural aspect of success). But I don’t know that the effects of slavery are still really being felt today other than causing racial diversity in regions of the globe. I’m coming to believe one of the most “damaging” things white Europeans actually did was interrupt other culture’s sociological evolution.

Kind of like the Prime Directive in Star Trek. Or a spoiled kid that gets given everything and never learns the need or value of working and earning for themselves (in a microcosm).

Discovery Channel here keeps playing commercials for “Marley Africa Road Trip”, and through this I learned about Bob Marley’s dream of a united Africa. Frankly, this is such a resource rich continent that it could be a global powerhouse. But it’s not. Forget uniting the continent, there are still tribes in individual countries butchering each other. Rwanda, anyone? Sierra Leone? Darfur? I can’t help but wonder if situations like these weren’t facilitated, not “because of guns”, but because guns were introduced to a culture before diplomacy.

Maybe tribes in Africa or some Native Americans would have stayed tribal so much longer because their environments didn’t require what other climates did. I don’t believe the Industrial Revolution came about because white people are smarter, but because of their culture, and possibly environment. This is something I really want to study now, and delve into the history of to discover more.

I still don’t have all my thoughts or conclusions together on the topic- which at the moment for me is, “Why do they do such slipshod work around here?” I can’t figure out what would possess somebody to cross traffic twice at a roundabout (walking through it length-wise) rather than simply cross a street once. Why doesn’t a grocery store care about inventory and stock monitoring? Why is everything so dirty? Why is it acceptable to simply stop in the middle of the road and hold up all the traffic behind you?

I feel like Leonardo DiCaprio’s character in Blood Diamond, simply saying “This is Africa” in a tone that implies it’s ok to give up hope. And I don’t have any silly notions of initiating some kind of cultural renaissance where suddenly people care about education and doing their best work and critical thought. But there are just times I can’t turn my brain off and I have to wonder just what went wrong and Mordin’s statement makes as much sense as any.

Back to the Well…

I hadn’t intended on writing a gun-related post so soon, but since Sebastian was kind enough to mention the new blog here I thought some content closer to what I’m known for might be in order. Ready for me to spit in the face of the tacti-cool?

The gun you already have is probably good enough.

I know. The guns rags keep showing you the wonder blaster of the month (it’s only in every magazine, so it must be good, right?), and the guy with the 1,000 yard stare that works the gun counter at your local firearms emporium keeps saying that the SuperShooterX is “what the teams use”. Maybe you’ve been spending too much time on a forum that swears a $2,500 1911 is the only acceptable pistol for professional use. Or maybe you’re just tired of your old pistol and want to trade it in on a new model.

Luckily for you, I have a two question metric to help you figure out if a new gun will improve your marksmanship:
1) Am I Rob Leatham, or have/will I meet him in a competitive arena?
2) Does my job include the higher than average probability for armed combat?

(Question 3, “Is my gun a Hi-Point?” will be covered in a future essay.)

Those questions may verge on being overly simple, but they should also get my point across. If you’re a competitor, take what I’m saying now and throw it right out the window- you’re already putting rounds downrange and have probably figured out what works for you and what doesn’t. Or perhaps you attend one or more professional training courses each year. Something along the lines of Massad Ayoob Group, Thunder Ranch, GunSite, Firearms Academy of Seattle, Yavapai… Something that has driven you to find the failure point of either your gear, or yourself will answer Question #1 for you in a more realistic manner. And Question #2 is not only self-explanatory, but unless you’re one of the lucky ones, you’re dept. or agency will likely tell you what sidearm you’ll be carrying anyway.

So, where does that leave the rest of us? Well despite my preferences, it leaves us with me telling you if you have a Taurus PT92 that you got a screaming deal on 2 years ago and have only fired 50 rounds through, then it’s good enough.

“But Eric!”, I hear somebody say. “The Taurus is a cheap gun and will probably jam and get the guy killed! Everyone knows for a pistol to truly be worthwhile it has to fire 5,000 rounds in pouring sand without a misfire!”

Here’s the thing: while statements like that are usually made out of genuine concern for a person and a desire to have the best possible equipment and odds of survival should the unthinkable occur, it won’t make a lick of difference to the unprepared.

Think about it… stew on it a little… aaaand hit you where it hurts by asking: Gentle Reader, do you own more firearms than you’ve attended professional classes and/or competitive matches? So really, are you prepared? Will the WunderBlaster 9000 truly make a difference in your marksmanship? Or, just maybe, the gun you already have is good enough and spending that hard-earned fantasy pistol cash would be better spent on ammo, training, and trigger time.

One Man Army?

Aside

Have you guys seen this show on Discovery? They’ve got some cool events, but this is some of the worst shooting I’ve ever seen. (Although they were shooting Sigs, and that would justify why I think my 226 is always low…)